Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:26:02 05/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2000 at 17:04:43, stuart taylor wrote: >On May 30, 2000 at 17:02:03, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On May 30, 2000 at 15:14:33, Chris Carson wrote: >> >>>See: http://home.interact.se/~w100107/may.htm >>> >>>My thanks to Tony Hedlund for posting the list >>>at his site. He has also posted the PGN's there. >>> >>>Two Performance Ratings above 2600 and Ten above 2500. >>>Eight Performance Ratings below 2500. Three below 2400. >>> >>>Fritz, Hiarcs, Rebel, Chess Master, Deep Junior, Shredder, >>>and Mchess Pro are all represented on the list. >>> >>>Deep Blue and Deep Blue II remain at the top, but the micro's >>>are closing in on Deep Blue, but still 200 points away from >>>Deep Blue II. >>> >>>All games are 40/2 and include all Rebel GM challenge, ISR2000, >>>and Dutch Championship. >>> >>I can't believe that! on what basis can deep blue be said to be 200 better than >>the micros? even deeper blue, but DEEP blue????? 200???? See my above post also >>(re hiarcs and belle etc.) >>S.Taylor >> >>>Best Regards, >>>Chris Carson > >Sorry! below "would hiarcs 7.32 win a match against..." >S.Taylor The answer is that Hiarcs wouldn't have a prayer. It didn't have a prayer against deep thought in the ACM days, which had a far slower overall hardware speed, yet was able to produce a performance rating of over 2550 against a bunch of GM players at 40/2... to win the fredkin stage II prize.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.