Author: Joshua Lee
Date: 14:54:45 05/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2000 at 17:02:40, blass uri wrote: >On May 30, 2000 at 16:51:08, stuart taylor wrote: > >>I just noticed on ssdf rating list details, that hiarcs7.32 on 450mhz. beat >>fritz 3 on 90mhz. 18.5 to 3.5. That fritz was very similar to the exact thing >>which beat deep blue at the time.ah!!!! so what do you say to that? >>S.Taylor > >I say that it is less than 90% and I read that Deep thought(not deep blue) got >more than 90% against Fritz3(p90) > >I do not know if to believe to the last claim because they did not do the games >public and I have no idea if the games are tournament time control or faster >time control(I am interested only in tournament time control games). > >Uri How about Hiarcs on my Athlon 800 Clocked to 880Mhz? I think if it is still taking Hiarcs on Pos 3 of the LCTII test 49minutes to solve it at 11ply and Deep Thought of 1989 which played Kasparov was searching 2M nps and 12Ply in 40/2 then Most computers would in fact win a game or two but not a match. also Deep Thought of 1988 at 750,000 nodes per second would be better but i have looked at games of the pre 1990 computers and can only say that Hiarcs has to be better than some of those computers because it can spot the mistakes right off the bat and wouldn't play the loosing move in the first place. I'll find the game.... other than that my reasoning was just that the opening books caused those programs to lose. maybe everyone interested should have their respective software analyze older games like that of Cray Blitz and Hitech.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.