Author: blass uri
Date: 23:32:06 05/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2000 at 19:59:01, Chris Carson wrote: >Interesting thread. I do not have any data >on Hiarcs 7.32. Wish I did, it should be a >stronger program than Hiarcs 6. A second >comment is that Hiarcs 6 achieved it's performance >rating on a 350 MHZ machine. It would be interesting to >see a 6 to 10 game tournament performance against >several GM's (not match) for Hiarcs 7.32 (or Shredder, >Deep Junior, Fritz (multi version), Rebel or CM) using >a 1 GHZ (or 4x 1GHZ by Deep Junior or Fritz multi). I am >sure we would see another 50 to 70 point increase in >Performance Rating, unless there was a hardware problem, operator error, >or mis-configuration error. To bad Harvard Cup and Aegeon is >not still around, ofcourse, they would need to have the >games at 40/2 tournament time controls (Aegeon was close, but >not quite there). > >Just one more observation. I think that Shredder is 100 points >underrated on my list due to a possible loss by an operator in the >last ISR2000 match. I have no way to be sure, just my opinion. :) > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson I am sure about it. the final position is a position that programs cannot lose. all programs see a big advantage for shredder in a short time and chessmaster(ss=10) can see a forced mate in less than 20 minutes in the final position. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.