Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:01:58 05/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 2000 at 14:00:53, Joshua Lee wrote: >[Event "?"] >[Site "ACM Atlanta"] >[Date "1973.??.??"] >[White "Chess"] >[Black "Belle "] >[Result "1-0"] >[WhiteElo "4 0 "] >[ECO "C44"] >[Round "1"] > >1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. c3 dxc3 5. Bc4 cxb2 6. Bxb2 Bb4+ 7. Nc3 d6 >8. Qb3 Bxc3+ 9. Bxc3 Qe710. Bxg7 Qxe4+ 11. Be2 Nd4 12. Bxd4 f6 13. Qb2 Qf5 14. >O-O h5 15. Nh4 Qg5 16. g3 Rh7 17. f4 Qd5 18. Bf3 Qc4 19. Bxf6 Nxf6 20. Qxf6 Qc5+ >21. Kh1 Qc2 22. Rfe1+ Be6 23. Qxe6+ Kf8 24. Bxb7 d5 25. Qf6+ Kg8 26. Bxd5+ Rf7 >27. Qxf7+ Kh8 28. Qf6+ 1-0 > >9...Qe7 any program today would never play this move. This was the game i was >refering to in my earlier post. I am not sure if it was an opening book error >but it shows that todays programs are atleast better than 1973.. > > >[Event "?"] >[Site ""] >[Date "1983.??.??"] >[White "Nuchess "] >[Black "Belle "] >[Result "1-0"] >[ECO "C77"] >[Round ""] > >1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. O-O Be7 7. e5 Ne4 >8. Nxd4 O-O 9. Nf5 d5 10. exd6 Bxf5 11. dxe7 Nxe7 12. Be3 Nd5 13. Qf3 Nxe3 14. >fxe3 Bg6 >15. Qf4 b5 16. Bb3 c5 17. c4 Qf6 18. Qxf6 Nxf6 19. Rc1 b4 20. Nd2 Rfe8 21. Re1 >Rad8 >22. Nf1 Bd3 23. Rad1 Ng4 24. Ba4 Rf8 25. Nd2 Ne5 26. Bb3 Rd6 27. Nf3 Nxf3+ 28. >gxf3 f5 >29. Rd2 Re8 30. Kf2 f4 31. exf4 Rxe1 32. Kxe1 Rd4 33. Kf2 Kf7 34. Ke3 Bxc4 35. >Rxd4 cxd4+ >36. Kxd4 Bxb3 37. axb3 Kf6 38. Ke4 g6 39. h4 Ke6 40. f5+ gxf5+ 41. Kd4 Kd6 42. >f4 Ke6 >43. Kc5 a5 44. h5 Kf7 45. Kd5 Kf6 46. Kd6 Kf7 47. Ke5 Ke8 48. Kxf5 1-0 > >if you put any program on analyse at blacks 32nd move you'll see that Kf7 is a >better move which doesn't lose a pawn at the least it may hold a draw. > >Belle in '83 was 2208elo well hiarcs in '00 and probably any of the top software >is around 2400elo. I plan on looking at Hitech's games next then pre 1995 Cray >blitz as to me with 1.5 million nodes a sec it won't find errors without >spending an hour on each move. Some 'perspective". In 1973 chess 4.0 was searching under 1,000 noded per second. The fastest it ever searched was 2,600 nps running on a cyber176 in 1976. I don't think _any_ program of today would lose to any program of the 1970's as the hardware advantage of today's machines is simply far too great.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.