Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New Tough Endgame Test Suite

Author: Vincent Lejeune

Date: 10:01:25 06/01/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 01, 2000 at 11:48:37, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:

>On June 01, 2000 at 05:30:31, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
>
>>On May 31, 2000 at 13:41:45, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>CAP records (some of them do not appear to have faired well):
>>...
>>>6k1/8/2P5/p6p/5bP1/7P/2B2K2/8 w - - acd 20; acn 1174673323; acs 3601; ce
>>>153; pv gxh5 Kg7 Kf3 Bh2 Kg4 Kh6 Bd1 Bc7 Kf5 Bb6 Ke6 Bc7 Kd7 Bf4 Kd8 Be5;
>>>8/5pk1/p7/8/4Q2P/3p4/5r2/3K4 b - - acd 16; acn 1007040910; acs 3601; ce -406; pv
>>>Re2 Qd4+ Kg8 Qd8+ Kg7 Qg5+ Kh7 Qf6 Kg8 Qxa6 Kg7 Qxd3 Re5 Qf3 f5 Qf4 Rd5+ Ke2
>>>Kf6;
>>
>>I really doubt that gxh5 is the best move because the h's pawn have the wrong
>>square colour to promote, if the black bishop stay on the h2-b8 diagonal with
>>can make no progress.
>>1.g5 seems to be stronger
>
>	g5 loses a pawn outright. I agree that gxh5 is a poor move. I think Kf3 is
>better.
>José.

If 1..Bxg5?, 2.c7! wins a queen ...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.