Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 20:08:56 06/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2000 at 21:10:32, Jorge Pichard wrote: >I Just took a moment to check the Message Board and read an interesting posting >by Daniel Chancey in which he pitted CMQueen+ vs Onil rated 2078. Even top human >playing program like Rebel Century once in a while lose a game against a low >rated human positional player. But since Daniel asked if there is a way to >improve the Original CMQueen+ Setting, after testing with different values to >the King Safety I found that increasing the King Safety from 100 to 110 give the >optimal King safety so far. Plus this setting resulted in a better CMQueen+ >setting. I already tested the new settings against several friends rated around >2350 to 2450 and it prove to be much better. Results against my four friends in game in 45 min per side using my AMD K62-500 Mhz is Won 3 and lost 1, average human players is 2398. The worse game was played agains Luis Manuel Cervantes rated 2365, but he played a very closed and positional game against CMQueen+ plus he avoided early trade of his pieces which were centralized. > >Thanks for constantly searching to improve the original setting. > >Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.