Author: blass uri
Date: 23:00:34 06/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 04, 2000 at 01:30:06, Pete Galati wrote: >On June 03, 2000 at 23:14:33, blass uri wrote: > >>On June 03, 2000 at 19:30:36, Natasha wrote: >> >>>Hi there everybody. >>>I use Chessmaster 7000 running on an AMD Athlon @ 650 Mhz with 192 Mb Ram. >>>Though i consider my Pc quite powerful, the program encounters difficulties in >>>beating other programs (e.g. Junior) running on slower machines. >>> >>>1.) Does anybody know where to get the best settings for my CM7K engine? >>> >>>2.) Which is the most powerful program-engine nowadays? >>> >>>Thanx - Kevin >>> >>>mailto:kevnat@galactica.it >> >>I suggest that you buy chessmaster6000 because chessmaster7000 cannot use more >>than 1 Mbyte hash tables. >> >>Chessmaster6000's engine is the same as chessmaster7000 when 6000 can use more >>hash tables. >> >>I do not buy a new program that play weaker so I did not buy chessmaster7000. >> >>Uri > >If CM7000 can't do more than 1mb hashtable then it sounds like they need to put >out a patch for that. I can't imagine why it would be released like that. I >wonder if there was some logical reason that I can't figure out. > >Pete I guess that the reason is that they assumed that customers do not care about the strength of the program(they probably assumed that if the program is at least at master level than the strength of it is not important). This is also the reason that chessmaster7000 has the same engine as chessmaster6000. They probably discovered that it is not the case and this is the reason that chessmaster8000 will have a better engine. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.