Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Endgame position / running passed pawns

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:52:07 06/05/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 05, 2000 at 20:46:11, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On June 05, 2000 at 08:22:44, Steffen Jakob wrote:
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>This is a position from an interesting standard game MissSilicon - Hossa, played
>>today at ICC:
>>
>>[D]5k2/7K/6P1/1p3p2/1P5P/1Pb5/8/8 w
>
>This is more interesting:
>
>[D]5k2/7K/6P1/1p3p2/1P5P/2b5/8/8 w
>
>The reason it's more interesting is that you don't get false evals due to white
>being up two pawns to one early on, and later three pawns to one.
>
>This isn't a pawn race problem.  After 1. h5 it should be easy to see that 2. h6
>is a terrible threat that costs a bishop.
>
>Once you get to that point, white gets the black f-pawn and we are left with a
>position a pawn up.
>
>It could be possible to mis-evaluate this as a win for white, due to the fact
>that white is a pawn up.  The only obvious thing preventing this mis-evaluation
>is the fact that it really is a win for white.
>

I agree that one is easier.  no oddball fail lows or highs.. just a steadily
increasing evaluation....

               10     1.02   5.88   1. h5 Bxb4 2. g7+ Ke7 3. h6 f4 4. g8=Q
                                    Bd6 5. Kg6 <HT>
               10->   1.03   5.88   1. h5 Bxb4 2. g7+ Ke7 3. h6 f4 4. g8=Q
                                    Bd6 5. Kg6 <HT>
               11     1.43   5.88   1. h5 Ke7 2. h6 Bxb4 3. g7 Bd2 4. Kg6
                                    Kd6 5. g8=Q Bxh6 6. Qd8+ Ke5 7. Kxh6
                                    <HT>
               11->   1.44   5.88   1. h5 Ke7 2. h6 Bxb4 3. g7 Bd2 4. Kg6
                                    Kd6 5. g8=Q Bxh6 6. Qd8+ Ke5 7. Kxh6
                                    <HT>
               12     1.70     ++   1. h5!!
               12->   3.02   6.27   1. h5 Ke7 2. h6 Bxb4 3. g7 Bd2 4. Kg6
                                    Kd6 5. g8=Q Bxh6 6. Qd8+ Ke5 7. Kxh6
                                    f4 <HT>
               13     3.27     ++   1. h5!!
               13     5.18   7.07   1. h5 Ke7 2. h6 Bxb4 3. g7 Bc3 4. g8=Q
                                    b4 5. Qg5+ Ke6 6. Kg6 Kd5 7. Qxf5+
                                    Kc4 8. Qe4+ Kc5 9. Qd3 <HT>
               13->   5.26   7.07   1. h5 Ke7 2. h6 Bxb4 3. g7 Bc3 4. g8=Q
                                    b4 5. Qg5+ Ke6 6. Kg6 Kd5 7. Qxf5+
                                    Kc4 8. Qe4+ Kc5 9. Qd3 <HT>
               14     6.69   7.25   1. h5 Ke7 2. h6 Bxb4 3. g7 Bc3 4. Kg6
                                    b4 5. h7 Kd7 6. h8=Q b3 7. Qb8 Bxg7
                                    8. Kxg7 f4 9. Qxb3
               14->   6.76   7.25   1. h5 Ke7 2. h6 Bxb4 3. g7 Bc3 4. Kg6
                                    b4 5. h7 Kd7 6. h8=Q b3 7. Qb8 Bxg7
                                    8. Kxg7 f4 9. Qxb3
               15     8.96   7.44   1. h5 Ke7 2. h6 Bxb4 3. g7 Bc3 4. Kg6
                                    b4 5. h7 Kd7 6. h8=Q b3 7. Qh7 Bxg7
                                    8. Qxg7+ Ke6 9. Qf7+ Ke5 10. Qxb3 <HT>
               15->   9.15   7.44   1. h5 Ke7 2. h6 Bxb4 3. g7 Bc3 4. Kg6
                                    b4 5. h7 Kd7 6. h8=Q b3 7. Qh7 Bxg7
                                    8. Qxg7+ Ke6 9. Qf7+ Ke5 10. Qxb3 <HT>
               16    13.36     ++   1. h5!!



>Here is a much harder position, especially without tables or a little tricky
>pawn knowledge:
>
>[D]5k2/7K/6P1/p4p2/P6P/2b5/8/8 w -
>
>Let your program chew on that for a bit.  You can achieve a similar position
>here, but the difference is that the q-side situation does not allow for a win
>once the g-pawn is sacrificed.

I get 0.00 instantly if I have tables turned on.  without them, I am going to
need a lot of time.  I will have to see that white's king gets stuck in front
of the a-pawn and can't get out without letting black's king sneak in and hold
the draw...




>
>My program has been chewing on this for a while on a slow machine and still
>thinks it is a win for white.
>
>I've seen several people hail various programs as brilliant in the original
>position, but I suggest that a combination of smart and coincidentally lucky
>doesn't add up to real brilliance.


Not at all.  :)




>
>bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.