Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 08:50:38 06/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2000 at 11:21:54, blass uri wrote: >On June 05, 2000 at 22:35:45, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On June 05, 2000 at 18:23:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>The CMQueen+ performs better at time >>>controls between 15 minutes to 60 minutes, it is not the best Speed playing >>>settings for CM6000, but it is considered the best so far, at a slower time >>>control. >>> >>>Pichard >> >>I think your statements needed to be cleaned up a bit. >> >>Firstly it is your opinion that CMQueen+ at slower time controls is the best, >>not a widespread opinion. >> >>CM6666 is still just another opinion as to being a strong setting, I believe >>when you asked for the strongest, there were many opinions including mine >>stating what was the best. And you decided to test along the path of CM6666. >> >>Plus testing CM6666 in CM6000 is not the same as testing it in CM7000. Even >>though the same engine is in both programs. CM7K default plays slightly slower >>and different than the default in CM6K. > >What is the difference between CM7000 and CM6000? >It is the same engine so the only difference can be in the parameters. > >The only reason for different moves that I can imagine(assuming the same engine) >is if the parameters of chessmaster7000 have not the same meaning as the >parameters of chessmaster6000. > >It is possible that 100 for mobility in chessmaster6000 means 110 for mobility >in chessmaster7000. > >If this is the case then I am interested to know what is the meaning of the >parameters of chessmaster7000. > >If people discover the meaning of the parameters of chessmaster7000 they can use >chessmaster7000 as a personality for chessmaster6000. > > >>So what might be a stronger setting in CM6000 could be weaker or even stronger >>in CM7000. > >I think that there is no reason to use CM7000 for testing when it cannot use >more than 1 Mbyte hash tables. > >When I heard that it has the same engine as CM6000 I decided not to buy it and >the fact that it cannot use more than 1 Mbyte is another reason not to buy it. > >Uri I agree, CM7K is a waste of Space. and yes your explanation of the parameters is pretty much what I was trying to say.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.