Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 15:41:38 06/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2000 at 09:57:20, Michael Cummings wrote: >On June 06, 2000 at 06:00:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On June 05, 2000 at 22:35:45, Michael Cummings wrote: >> >>>On June 05, 2000 at 18:23:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>The CMQueen+ performs better at time >>>>controls between 15 minutes to 60 minutes, it is not the best Speed playing >>>>settings for CM6000, but it is considered the best so far, at a slower time >>>>control. >>>> >>>>Pichard >>> >>>I think your statements needed to be cleaned up a bit. >>> >>>Firstly it is your opinion that CMQueen+ at slower time controls is the best, >>>not a widespread opinion. >>> >>>CM6666 is still just another opinion as to being a strong setting, I believe >>>when you asked for the strongest, there were many opinions including mine >>>stating what was the best. And you decided to test along the path of CM6666. >>> >>>Plus testing CM6666 in CM6000 is not the same as testing it in CM7000. Even >>>though the same engine is in both programs. CM7K default plays slightly slower >>>and different than the default in CM6K. >>> >>>So what might be a stronger setting in CM6000 could be weaker or even stronger >>>in CM7000. >>> >>>I think if you are going to test CM6666 in CM7000, then you rename it to maybe >>>CM7777. >>> >>>In my testing CM6K default is better than the CM7K default in testing against >>>each other. But you will also find opinions against this, basically they are >>>suppose to be the same, but they are not, there was some minor changes to the >>>engine play. Probably in the default personality settings. >>> >>>Either play CM6K settings in CM6K or rename them. >> >>I have never tested CMQueen+ Settings in CM7000, and I did mentioned that SO FAR >>it is considered one of the best personality settings for CM6000 not the best, >>until it is proven weaker by another personality settings at longer time >>control. >> >>Pichard > >I was not meaning you when I said your settings in CM7K. I was talking about >this upcoming tournament. And how if anyone wanted to take part they must have >CM7K. > >But I do stand by my statement in reply to your >"but it is considered the best so far" >It may be one of the best, I will not argue with your statement there. But in >your original post your wording did imply that if it is the best so far, than it >is the best currently. That I will argue against. If you know about a stronger personality than CMQueen+ this is your chance to reveal the personality settings and to test it against CMQueen+, but I have not seen any personality stronger than CMQueen+ at any time control above 10 minutes, so far. Another personality that was recommended to me to test against CMQueen+ was CM-SS10, whuich is the original ChessMaster but changing the selective Search to 10. I Match CM-SS10 vs CMQueen+ and my setting at 30 min per side 20 games, beat the CM-SS10 by 6 points. Please reveal your personalities so other people have a chance to testit against their personality choice. Pichard > >I have no problem with your results, just the wording of some of your >statements. > >One comment I will make to everyone is that I think if anyone is going to test >Chessmaster personalities, that they bypass CM7K and use CM6K, apart from being >a better program, it is far more stable.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.