Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 17:22:13 06/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2000 at 18:41:38, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On June 06, 2000 at 09:57:20, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On June 06, 2000 at 06:00:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On June 05, 2000 at 22:35:45, Michael Cummings wrote: >>> >>>>On June 05, 2000 at 18:23:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>The CMQueen+ performs better at time >>>>>controls between 15 minutes to 60 minutes, it is not the best Speed playing >>>>>settings for CM6000, but it is considered the best so far, at a slower time >>>>>control. >>>>> >>>>>Pichard >>>> >>>>I think your statements needed to be cleaned up a bit. >>>> >>>>Firstly it is your opinion that CMQueen+ at slower time controls is the best, >>>>not a widespread opinion. >>>> >>>>CM6666 is still just another opinion as to being a strong setting, I believe >>>>when you asked for the strongest, there were many opinions including mine >>>>stating what was the best. And you decided to test along the path of CM6666. >>>> >>>>Plus testing CM6666 in CM6000 is not the same as testing it in CM7000. Even >>>>though the same engine is in both programs. CM7K default plays slightly slower >>>>and different than the default in CM6K. >>>> >>>>So what might be a stronger setting in CM6000 could be weaker or even stronger >>>>in CM7000. >>>> >>>>I think if you are going to test CM6666 in CM7000, then you rename it to maybe >>>>CM7777. >>>> >>>>In my testing CM6K default is better than the CM7K default in testing against >>>>each other. But you will also find opinions against this, basically they are >>>>suppose to be the same, but they are not, there was some minor changes to the >>>>engine play. Probably in the default personality settings. >>>> >>>>Either play CM6K settings in CM6K or rename them. >>> >>>I have never tested CMQueen+ Settings in CM7000, and I did mentioned that SO FAR >>>it is considered one of the best personality settings for CM6000 not the best, >>>until it is proven weaker by another personality settings at longer time >>>control. >>> >>>Pichard >> >>I was not meaning you when I said your settings in CM7K. I was talking about >>this upcoming tournament. And how if anyone wanted to take part they must have >>CM7K. >> >>But I do stand by my statement in reply to your >>"but it is considered the best so far" >>It may be one of the best, I will not argue with your statement there. But in >>your original post your wording did imply that if it is the best so far, than it >>is the best currently. That I will argue against. > >If you know about a stronger personality than CMQueen+ this is your chance to >reveal the personality settings and to test it against CMQueen+, but I have not >seen any personality stronger than CMQueen+ at any time control above 10 >minutes, so far. Another personality that was recommended to me to test against >CMQueen+ was CM-SS10, whuich is the original ChessMaster but changing the >selective Search to 10. I Match CM-SS10 vs CMQueen+ and my setting at 30 min per >side 20 games, beat the CM-SS10 by 6 points. Please reveal your personalities so >other people have a chance to testit against their personality choice. > >Pichard >> >>I have no problem with your results, just the wording of some of your >>statements. >> >>One comment I will make to everyone is that I think if anyone is going to test >>Chessmaster personalities, that they bypass CM7K and use CM6K, apart from being >>a better program, it is far more stable. I have done enough CM testing, at 40/2 my testing showed CM6K SS=10 to be the strongest. I will leave it at that for now
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.