Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 17:49:48 06/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2000 at 20:22:13, Michael Cummings wrote: >On June 06, 2000 at 18:41:38, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On June 06, 2000 at 09:57:20, Michael Cummings wrote: >> >>>On June 06, 2000 at 06:00:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On June 05, 2000 at 22:35:45, Michael Cummings wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 05, 2000 at 18:23:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>The CMQueen+ performs better at time >>>>>>controls between 15 minutes to 60 minutes, it is not the best Speed playing >>>>>>settings for CM6000, but it is considered the best so far, at a slower time >>>>>>control. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pichard >>>>> >>>>>I think your statements needed to be cleaned up a bit. >>>>> >>>>>Firstly it is your opinion that CMQueen+ at slower time controls is the best, >>>>>not a widespread opinion. >>>>> >>>>>CM6666 is still just another opinion as to being a strong setting, I believe >>>>>when you asked for the strongest, there were many opinions including mine >>>>>stating what was the best. And you decided to test along the path of CM6666. >>>>> >>>>>Plus testing CM6666 in CM6000 is not the same as testing it in CM7000. Even >>>>>though the same engine is in both programs. CM7K default plays slightly slower >>>>>and different than the default in CM6K. >>>>> >>>>>So what might be a stronger setting in CM6000 could be weaker or even stronger >>>>>in CM7000. >>>>> >>>>>I think if you are going to test CM6666 in CM7000, then you rename it to maybe >>>>>CM7777. >>>>> >>>>>In my testing CM6K default is better than the CM7K default in testing against >>>>>each other. But you will also find opinions against this, basically they are >>>>>suppose to be the same, but they are not, there was some minor changes to the >>>>>engine play. Probably in the default personality settings. >>>>> >>>>>Either play CM6K settings in CM6K or rename them. >>>> >>>>I have never tested CMQueen+ Settings in CM7000, and I did mentioned that SO FAR >>>>it is considered one of the best personality settings for CM6000 not the best, >>>>until it is proven weaker by another personality settings at longer time >>>>control. >>>> >>>>Pichard >>> >>>I was not meaning you when I said your settings in CM7K. I was talking about >>>this upcoming tournament. And how if anyone wanted to take part they must have >>>CM7K. >>> >>>But I do stand by my statement in reply to your >>>"but it is considered the best so far" >>>It may be one of the best, I will not argue with your statement there. But in >>>your original post your wording did imply that if it is the best so far, than it >>>is the best currently. That I will argue against. >> >>If you know about a stronger personality than CMQueen+ this is your chance to >>reveal the personality settings and to test it against CMQueen+, but I have not >>seen any personality stronger than CMQueen+ at any time control above 10 >>minutes, so far. Another personality that was recommended to me to test against >>CMQueen+ was CM-SS10, whuich is the original ChessMaster but changing the >>selective Search to 10. I Match CM-SS10 vs CMQueen+ and my setting at 30 min per >>side 20 games, beat the CM-SS10 by 6 points. Please reveal your personalities so >>other people have a chance to testit against their personality choice. >> >>Pichard >>> >>>I have no problem with your results, just the wording of some of your >>>statements. >>> >>>One comment I will make to everyone is that I think if anyone is going to test >>>Chessmaster personalities, that they bypass CM7K and use CM6K, apart from being >>>a better program, it is far more stable. > >I have done enough CM testing, at 40/2 my testing showed CM6K SS=10 to be the >strongest. I will leave it at that for now Michael you probably have done enough CM testing at 40/2 but you have never tested CM=10 vs CMQueen+ at any time control. Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.