Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 22:48:12 06/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2000 at 01:40:05, pete wrote: >On June 06, 2000 at 17:40:28, Dann Corbit wrote: >>On June 06, 2000 at 16:52:13, pete wrote: >>[snip] >>>Look at the great chess literature like "New York 1924 " , "Alekhine's best >>>Games" , "Fisher's 60 memorable games" >> >>Have you looked at the CAP analysis for NY1924? There are definitely a few >>surprises in there. >> >>[snip] > >I have looked at a few CAP-analysis of NY1924 but certainly not at most of them >. Which ones are most interesting and containing surprises ? Maybe you could >post some examples , would be interesting . I had to send the book back to the library. I seem to remember some unseen checkmates. Of course, many of the choices the programs made were different in very many places. It's hard to know if the computer choices were dumb, after all, these were some of the greatest chess players of all time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.