Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 02:22:48 06/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2000 at 20:49:48, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On June 06, 2000 at 20:22:13, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On June 06, 2000 at 18:41:38, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On June 06, 2000 at 09:57:20, Michael Cummings wrote: >>> >>>>On June 06, 2000 at 06:00:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 05, 2000 at 22:35:45, Michael Cummings wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On June 05, 2000 at 18:23:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>The CMQueen+ performs better at time >>>>>>>controls between 15 minutes to 60 minutes, it is not the best Speed playing >>>>>>>settings for CM6000, but it is considered the best so far, at a slower time >>>>>>>control. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Pichard >>>>>> >>>>>>I think your statements needed to be cleaned up a bit. >>>>>> >>>>>>Firstly it is your opinion that CMQueen+ at slower time controls is the best, >>>>>>not a widespread opinion. >>>>>> >>>>>>CM6666 is still just another opinion as to being a strong setting, I believe >>>>>>when you asked for the strongest, there were many opinions including mine >>>>>>stating what was the best. And you decided to test along the path of CM6666. >>>>>> >>>>>>Plus testing CM6666 in CM6000 is not the same as testing it in CM7000. Even >>>>>>though the same engine is in both programs. CM7K default plays slightly slower >>>>>>and different than the default in CM6K. >>>>>> >>>>>>So what might be a stronger setting in CM6000 could be weaker or even stronger >>>>>>in CM7000. >>>>>> >>>>>>I think if you are going to test CM6666 in CM7000, then you rename it to maybe >>>>>>CM7777. >>>>>> >>>>>>In my testing CM6K default is better than the CM7K default in testing against >>>>>>each other. But you will also find opinions against this, basically they are >>>>>>suppose to be the same, but they are not, there was some minor changes to the >>>>>>engine play. Probably in the default personality settings. >>>>>> >>>>>>Either play CM6K settings in CM6K or rename them. >>>>> >>>>>I have never tested CMQueen+ Settings in CM7000, and I did mentioned that SO FAR >>>>>it is considered one of the best personality settings for CM6000 not the best, >>>>>until it is proven weaker by another personality settings at longer time >>>>>control. >>>>> >>>>>Pichard >>>> >>>>I was not meaning you when I said your settings in CM7K. I was talking about >>>>this upcoming tournament. And how if anyone wanted to take part they must have >>>>CM7K. >>>> >>>>But I do stand by my statement in reply to your >>>>"but it is considered the best so far" >>>>It may be one of the best, I will not argue with your statement there. But in >>>>your original post your wording did imply that if it is the best so far, than it >>>>is the best currently. That I will argue against. >>> >>>If you know about a stronger personality than CMQueen+ this is your chance to >>>reveal the personality settings and to test it against CMQueen+, but I have not >>>seen any personality stronger than CMQueen+ at any time control above 10 >>>minutes, so far. Another personality that was recommended to me to test against >>>CMQueen+ was CM-SS10, whuich is the original ChessMaster but changing the >>>selective Search to 10. I Match CM-SS10 vs CMQueen+ and my setting at 30 min per >>>side 20 games, beat the CM-SS10 by 6 points. Please reveal your personalities so >>>other people have a chance to testit against their personality choice. >>> >>>Pichard >>>> >>>>I have no problem with your results, just the wording of some of your >>>>statements. >>>> >>>>One comment I will make to everyone is that I think if anyone is going to test >>>>Chessmaster personalities, that they bypass CM7K and use CM6K, apart from being >>>>a better program, it is far more stable. >> >>I have done enough CM testing, at 40/2 my testing showed CM6K SS=10 to be the >>strongest. I will leave it at that for now > >Michael you probably have done enough CM testing at 40/2 but you have never >tested CM=10 vs CMQueen+ at any time control. > I tested CM=10 vs CMQueen+ in game in 90 minutes per side, and out of 5 games CMQueen+ won3 Lost1 D 1, but when I matched them in game in 40/2, CM=10 won the only game which I have tested so far. Now I am rewording my statement CMQueen+ so far is better than CM=10 in game control between 10 min to 90 min per side. >Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.