Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: interesting position

Author: leonid

Date: 19:46:40 06/09/00

Go up one level in this thread

On June 09, 2000 at 20:08:37, Jon Dart wrote:

>12 ply is about right to see this, but your node counts are way
>above what mine are. So, yes, it seems like you are over-extending
>somehow, or maybe have inefficient move ordering.
>
>--Jon

Thank for saying that this position demand 12 plies! I tried it first up to 10
ply but could not reach indicated response. Expected that, maybe, I have some
bug more. Just fixed 5 in the last month. Dreamed to end my cleaning work.

On AMD 400Mhz.

Hiarcs look and find indicated response by brute force 8 ply deep. It take 14
minutes 58 sec. Probably its extensions goes as far as 4 next plies.

My logic find indicated response only 12 ply deep. Search done by brute force.
No extensions or transpositional tables. Time: 1 hour and 42 minutes. Average
speed: 200200 nps.

Leonid.

• Re: interesting position Ernst Walet 03:34:51 06/10/00
  • Re: interesting position leonid 06:52:51 06/10/00
• Re: interesting position James Robertson 20:57:18 06/09/00
  • Re: interesting position leonid 03:28:27 06/10/00
    • Re: interesting position blass uri 05:33:27 06/10/00
      • Re: interesting position leonid 07:06:09 06/10/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.