Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Difficult endgame test position (but solvable for humans!)

Author: blass uri

Date: 22:04:32 06/09/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 09, 2000 at 19:14:52, Oliver Roese wrote:

>On June 09, 2000 at 15:11:00, blass uri wrote:
>
>>On June 09, 2000 at 13:59:44, blass uri wrote:
>>
>>>On June 09, 2000 at 12:11:16, Ernst A. Heinz wrote:
>>>
>>>>>[D]8/8/Pk5K/2p5/2P1pp2/8/5P1P/8 w - - 0 1
>>>>>
>>>>>Programs cannot see at evaluation time that black is winning because of
>>>>>unstoppable pawn.
>>>>>
>>>>>If I give them to analyze at 1 ply depth they give a big advantage for white.
>>>>
>>>>What do you mean by "big advantage"?
>>>>
>>>>"DarkThought WCCC'99" knows about White's unstoppable passed Pawn
>>>>on h2 and it also knows about the potential breakthrough of the
>>>>two Black Pawns on e4 and f4. Both somehow cancel each other out
>>>>in the static evaluation such that the overall score is just the
>>>>+1 material advantage of White.
>>>>
>>>>=Ernst=
>>>
>>>Some other programs gave more than +2 for white and in one of the cases(I think
>>>it was hiarcs7.32) they gave even about +7 pawns at 1 ply depth.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>Here are some scores of chess programs at depth 1
>>
>>chessmaster6000(7.21)
>>Hiarcs7.32(7.18)
>>Fritz5.32(6.16)
>>Genius3 depth 1 with selective search=0(5.39)
>>Rebel century1.2a(4.36 and the score at depth 2 is even 7.76 and only at depth 3
>>becomes negative)
>>Junior5.9 (3.41)
>>Crafty17.10(2.97)
>>CometB20(2.80)
>>CometB11(2.20)
>>Junior4.6 (1.78)
>>Exchess2.51(0.79)
>>
>>No program can see that white is losing at evlauation time or even at depth 1
>>
>>Uri
>
>How would a human look at the position?
>It would notify that both white and black have unstoppable passers/candidates
>and a directed search is required to see, who is the winner.

It is easy to see without a directed search that the black pawn will win because
it is more closer to the queening square by more than one square.


>"Deep Thought" evaluates it this way, but the others fail.

I do not know about deep thought but tal does not fail to evaluate this
position.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.