Author: blass uri
Date: 15:43:57 06/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 10, 2000 at 08:28:07, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >You know very well why you were censored. You made the direct claim, here in >CCC, that I specifically wrote crafty so that if it was getting mated, it would >sit and run out of time rather than letting the opponent mate me. The cases discussed was about losing on time in a drawn position. I remember that Amir admitted that he did a bad job in explaining himself. He meant to criticize crafty's behaviour against computers and meant to criticize the fact that you did not look for the game to see the reason for the fact that crafty lost on time in the position that it has nothing to lose from it but he did not mean to say the direct claim that you and some other people understood. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.