Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Interesting result from SSDF

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 07:12:10 06/11/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 11, 2000 at 01:39:01, blass uri wrote:

>On June 11, 2000 at 01:35:16, blass uri wrote:
>
>>On June 10, 2000 at 21:07:53, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On June 10, 2000 at 18:43:57, blass uri wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 10, 2000 at 08:28:07, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You know very well why you were censored.  You made the direct claim, here in
>>>>>CCC, that I specifically wrote crafty so that if it was getting mated, it would
>>>>>sit and run out of time rather than letting the opponent mate me.
>>>>
>>>>The cases discussed was about losing on time in a drawn position.
>>>>I remember that Amir admitted that he did a bad job in explaining himself.
>>>>
>>>>He meant to criticize crafty's behaviour against computers and meant to
>>>>criticize the fact that you did not look for the game to see the reason for the
>>>>fact that crafty lost on time in the position that it has nothing to lose from
>>>>it but he did not mean to say the direct claim that you and some other people
>>>>understood.
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>>>
>>>
>>>all he had to do was post a one line explanation...
>>>
>>>I don't remember losing on time in a drawn position.  I don't see how that would
>>>be considered "abusive".  It would be considered "stupid".  not moving when
>>>getting mated could be considered abusive, but losing a drawn game by not moving
>>>seems to be a long way from that...
>>
>>The point is that the game was drawn when crafty lost on time because Junior had
>>only a bishop.
>>
>>I do not remember that Amir complained that Crafty lost on time instead of
>>getting mated.
>>
>>The fact is that crafty lost on time instead of draing in another way and it was
>>because of a bug.
>>
>>Uri
>
>The bug was corrected and I believe that the fact that Amir reacted in the way
>he reacted is also because of the fact that he did not like the fact that the
>discussion was not about the real problem.
>
>Uri


The only way I could see this being a draw issue would be if crafty had (say)
a KBP vs a KB, that was a dead draw.  In that case, if the clock flag falls,
crafty couldn't lose.

As far as the rest, didn't _you_ tell _him_ about a few thing you considered
"bugs" and he didn't seem interested in fixing them at all?  If I tell someone
about a problem, I do that because I am interested in helping them.  I am not
going to be concerned whether they fix the problem or not, after I do my part
by reporting it.  I don't consider it my problem beyond that point.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.