Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:22:09 06/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 11, 2000 at 10:14:38, aloysius wrote:
>I guess I did not make myself clear? The "simple" I used was supposed to be in
>terms of understanding it {heavily commented :)} not the code being simple, in
>other words brief, and a lot of functions missing.
>-Aloysius
This is what I assumed you meant. I have _always_ tried to write Crafty so
that it is understandable. The problem is that it is also _big_. And a lot
of easy to understand things, when combined into a big program, become very
hard to remember/follow/understand...
The sheer size of 50,000 lines of code is daunting until you _really_ study it
enough (I have of course) to know what is done where and why. Then it isn't so
complex any more... but reading someone else's code is _always_ harder than
reading your own.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.