Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Interesting Game by Chop

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 08:19:35 06/12/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 12, 2000 at 05:10:54, Peter McKenzie wrote:

>I watched following game on ICC this evening.  The game was funny because I'd
>just been thinking that Chop (Beadle) sacs the exchange too often and was
>thinking of ways to fix this problem.  When I saw Rxa4 come along in this game I
>though 'oh now, here we go again', but as events unfolded Chop whipped up a cool
>attack.  These are the sort of games that keep me interested in this silly hobby
>of computer chess :-)  I don't think you'll find the Rf8-f5-d5-d1 rook walk in
>too many text books.
>
>I don't know if giving up the exchange was sound (analysis welcome), but it
>certainly was entertaining.  Hard luck to Amateur (& Will), I'm sure revenge
>will be swift :-)
>
>[Event "ICC 5 2"]
>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>[Date "2000.06.12"]
>[Round "-"]
>[White "Amateur"]
>[Black "Beadle"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ICCResult "White resigns"]
>[WhiteElo "2498"]
>[BlackElo "2508"]
>[Opening "Three knights: Steinitz variation"]
>[ECO "C46"]
>[NIC "KP.06"]
>[Time "04:21:45"]
>[TimeControl "300+2"]
>
>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 g6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nxd4 Bg7 6. Nxc6 bxc6 7. Qf3 d6
>8. Bc4 Be6 9. Bxe6 fxe6 10. Bd2 Rb8 11. O-O-O Ne7 12. Na4 Rf8 13. Qe3 Be5
>14. g3 Qc8 15. Qe2 Qb7 16. b3 Qb5 17. c4 Qb7 18. h4 Bd4 19. Be3 Bxe3+ 20.
>Qxe3 Qa6 21. h5 g5 22. Qxg5 Rb4 23. Qe3 Rxa4 24. bxa4 Qxc4+ 25. Kb2 c5 26.
>e5 Nd5 27. Qd2 Qxa4 28. exd6 cxd6 29. Ka1 Rf5 30. Rde1 Kd7 31. Rb1 Nb4 32.
>Rb2 Rd5 33. Qe2 Kd8 34. f4 h6 35. Qe4 a5 36. Rhb1 Rd1 37. Qe2 Rxb1+ 38. Rxb1
>Nc2+ 39. Kb2 Na3 40. Rd1 Nb5 41. Qc2 Qa3+ 42. Ka1 Nd4 43. Qg6 Qc3+ 44. Kb1
>Nb5 45. a4 Qb3+ 46. Kc1 Qe3+ 47. Rd2 Nd4 48. Qf6+ Kd7 49. Qf7+ Kc6 50. Qe8+
>Kd5 51. Qa8+ Kc4 52. Qg2 Nb3+ 53. Kd1 Nxd2 54. Qxd2 Qxg3 55. Qxd6 Qd3+ 56.
>Qxd3+ Kxd3 {White resigns} 0-1
>
>Position before 23... Rxa4
>[D]4kr2/p1p1n2p/q1ppp3/7P/NrP1P3/1P2Q1P1/P4P2/2KR3R b - -


This seems sound to me.  I tried it with crafty and got the following:

         nss  depth   time  score   variation (1)
                1     0.00  -1.55   1. ... Kd8
                1->   0.02  -1.55   1. ... Kd8
                2     0.02  -1.84   1. ... Kd8 2. Qd4
                2->   0.04  -1.84   1. ... Kd8 2. Qd4
                3     0.05  -1.69   1. ... Kd8 2. Nc5 Qa3+ 3. Kb1
                3     0.06     ++   1. ... Rxa4!!
                3     0.07  -1.28   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                3->   0.08  -1.28   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                4     0.09  -1.28   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                4->   0.12  -1.28   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                5     0.15  -1.28   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qb4+
                                    4. Kc2 Qxa4+ 5. Kb1
                5->   0.19  -1.28   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qb4+
                                    4. Kc2 Qxa4+ 5. Kb1
                6     0.24  -1.29   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. h6 Kf7
                6->   0.30  -1.29   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. h6 Kf7
                7     0.43  -1.25   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qb4+
                                    4. Ka1 Qxa4 5. h6 Kf7
                7->   0.55  -1.25   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qb4+
                                    4. Ka1 Qxa4 5. h6 Kf7
                8     0.86  -1.28   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. Rd3 Kf7 5. Qf4+ Ke8 6. Qg4 Rxf2
                                    7. Qxe6
                8->   1.31  -1.28   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. Rd3 Kf7 5. Qf4+ Ke8 6. Qg4 Rxf2
                                    7. Qxe6
                9     2.86  -1.38   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. Rd3 c5 5. Rhd1 Qb5+ 6. Rb3 Qc4
                9->   7.31  -1.38   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. Rd3 c5 5. Rhd1 Qb5+ 6. Rb3 Qc4
               10     9.53  -1.31   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. Rd3 c5 5. Rc1 Kf7 6. Qf4+ Kg8 7.
                                    Qg4+ Kf7
               10->  13.13  -1.31   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. Rd3 c5 5. Rc1 Kf7 6. Qf4+ Kg8 7.
                                    Qg4+ Kf7
               11    33.51  -1.46   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. Rd2 Ng8 5. h6 Nf6 6. f3 Qb5+ 7.
                                    Rb2 Qa4
               11->   2:14  -1.46   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. Rd2 Ng8 5. h6 Nf6 6. f3 Qb5+ 7.
                                    Rb2 Qa4
               12     2:54  -1.28   1. ... Rxa4 2. bxa4 Qxc4+ 3. Kb1 Qxa4
                                    4. Ka1 c5 5. Rb1 Nc6 6. Rb7 Nd4 7.
                                    Rb8+ Ke7 8. Rb7



The above on my PII/400 notebook.  Black seems to be in a bit of difficulty and
this at least exposes white's king to a bit of mischief by black.  Whether it
ends up winning or not probably depends on white's choice for defending...  But
it is not really an exchange sac...  black gets a piece + 2 pawns for the rook,
so material is equal, white white's king exposed.

I'd say you did fine here in playing this move...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.