Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 08:51:08 06/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 12, 2000 at 11:48:27, aloysius wrote: >On June 12, 2000 at 10:47:58, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On June 12, 2000 at 10:19:50, aloysius wrote: >> >>>Maybe instead of no books, I consider letting the engine join a tournament with >>>an empty book. Letting the engine build a book for itself. >>> If the program plays some sort of funny line, maybe more things should be in >>>the evaluation function, and not by some fine tuning by the programmer, the >>>computer plays "properly". >> >>You are saying "letting", but what it _really_ means is "forcing". No >>programmer is going to want their program to have to build it's own book during >>a tournament. >> >>Pete > >What about using pre-built books build from its own games only; not from 'Super' >GM games? Then people will still complain that the computer can remember its games perfectly. No matter what you do, somebody in the anti-opening-book camp will find a fault with it. -Tom
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.