Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Article: Stefan Meyer-Kahlen explains the success of his program.

Author: blass uri

Date: 02:14:36 06/13/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 12, 2000 at 23:45:33, Hans Gerber wrote:

>On June 12, 2000 at 17:33:57, Joachim Denzler wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>>This was not the point. Remember that the winning version in 1999 was something
>>>above version 3. So I understand that it is version 4.
>>>
>>>But this is neither the question. the exact number of the version was not the
>>>main point for my question. The main question was why a Champion (of June 1999!)
>>>is sold for 7 US$.
>>>
>>>Then Meyer-Kahlen came and confirmed that it is not closely one of the actual
>>>versions. For me this is a very important statement. Perhaps it was too
>>>difficult to understand. The 7- dollar- program is presented as the Championship
>>>version (!) of the program by S. M.-K.. That is the point. No matter if you
>>>think it's not 3 or M.-K. confirms it is not one of the (good) complete
>>>versions, M.-K. did not play with a slim version of his program to win the
>>>championship.
>>
>>I followed this discussion and was first puzzled by the price of the program,
>>then more puzzled by the answer of Mr. Mayer-Kahlen, and most puzzled
>>by the description of the box that looks pretty much like the box I got as I
>>bought Shredder 4 from ICD. Since I am one of the nox-experts that have been
>>mentioned below it would be very difficult for me to decide whether or not I got
>>the true version 4 of Shredder for the 100$, or something like a Shredder 3.x
>>version (at least I have the endgame CD's, and much more. "This should be enough
>>for 100$. Do you really expect to have also Shredder 4 in it?" - just kidding).
>>
>>If there is really made no clear distinction between the different version of a
>>program this would be one reason not to buy this program any longer. How can I
>>make sure that I do not get an older version that has been on stock for a while?
>>
>>>
>>>The superficiality of such discussions is telling. My last debate was about the
>>>Deep Blue match and who was to blame for the bad climate between the two
>>>parties. If you isolate parts of a question you might succeed in finding quick
>>>answers but you can not find the truth. In a way the impossibility to find the
>>>truth allows a strong verdict against a certain party. If you are familiar with
>>>science and its reasoning this is all but totally new information.
>>>
>>>In our actual debate the point is that Stefan Meyer-Kahlen is responsible (since
>>>his name is figuring on the box and CD with the name of hcc) for a situation
>>>where his "championship (!) version" is sold for 7 dollars and he confirms
>>>without hesitation that the program is (of course) _not_ one of the complete
>>>good versions... In science we call it a contradiction. In science you can not
>>>simply produce contradictions without hurting your good name. Now the selling of
>>
>>This is exactly the problem that I also have right now! Perhaps the next step
>>would be that we read here: "You have to buy Shredder directly from Millenium
>>2000 - do you really expect to get the latest version from ICD". Again, this is
>>of course overdrawn ;-)
>>
>>>a product is not science at all, but it still throws a bad light on you if you
>>>try to hide your responsibility for a market strategy (to omit to qualify the
>>>technique with the justified verdict) and run away with the money.
>>>
>>>Must I repeat that it is written on the box that this is the championship
>>>version that was playing on a "normal" PC?
>>>
>>>Of course the expert knows that this can not be true because all the endgame CDs
>>>are not in the box. Of course this, of course that.
>>>
>>>
>>>Hans Gerber
>>>
>>>
>>
>>In this sense I fully agree with Hans Gerber and would like to see a more honest
>>marketing strategy of Millenium (perhaps I live outside reality?!)
>>
>>Joachim Denzler
>
>
>Outside the marketing reality perhaps.
>
>In the meantime I did install the program.
>
>First observations.
>
>1. The display looks very inviting. Similarities with the WIN version of GENIUS
>are obvious.
>
>2. I could not find a cconcrete description of the engine.
>
>3. The help file with F1 is opening as a HTML.
>
>4. What a surprise! Right on the first page you can see a photo of Stefan
>Meyer-Kahlen with his wife Anna, both holding a trophy in their hands.
>
>5. The text is not exactly telling that you have SHREDDER on your PC. This
>"missing link" is mentioned but not openly outspoken.
>
>6. Let me describe the tricky method. Above of the page you read "World
>Champion". Then the photo. Then the text. Again Stefan Meyer-Kahlen is mentioned
>who has won the championship in June 1999 with his computerprogram SHREDDER.
>There you have it. So, if you have here the 'World Champion', it is clear that
>you "have" SHREDDER, since SHREDDER became World Champion in 1999.
>
>In reality you do not have SHREDDER, the one of Paderborn, because e.g. the
>endgame CDs are not included. Still you can read that you hold in your hands the
>winning program that ran on a "normal" PIII with 550 MHz. The method is the same
>as above. If you are the owner of such a PC and you did install SHREDDER, excuse
>me, the WORLD CHAMPION of course, then you play with the winning program of the
>last championship.
>
>In reality you do not play with that program because of the missing endgames.
>
>
>Conclusion
>
>The more the version of the here presented program differs from the "version"
>(must be version 4) at Paderborn 1999, the more the text (on the box, on the CD
>and in the files of the program) does not tell you the truth about itself.
>
>Question again, who is to believe? The Stefan Meyer-Kahlen of CCC or the Stefan
>Meyer-Kahlen as one of the notified responsibles for the mentioned product?
>
>Important note. The whole theme does not go about really big money. The point is
>the importance of a certain style, a hopefully scientific attitude as a
>programmer and the moral of people in the chess business.
>
>
>
>Hans Gerber

My opinion is that it is unfair to use the fact that shredder is the world
champion to sell previous versions of shredder(shredder3 and previous versions).

I do not want to blame stefan about it because I do not know if he is
responsible for this behaviour.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.