Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Just learning capability?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 02:45:35 06/13/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 13, 2000 at 05:01:25, blass uri wrote:
[snip]
>The problem is that a lot of humans do not want to play against programs in
>their best.
>
>The result is that computers are not allowed to play in most human tournaments.
>
>If you want to see more comp-human games in tournaments the only possibility is
>to have limitations for the programs in part of the tournaments.
>
>I think that limitation about the hardware is the only possible idea to get more
>comp-human games.

If this is true, then the GM's are cowards.  IMO-YMMV.  If they would expend
effort learning how to defeat computers they would not be so unnecessarily
fearful of them.  Even at that, though, someday the computers will be better.

>I do not want to have less comp-human games when the computers have no
>limitations but to have also computer-human games when the programs have
>limitation about the hardware so using opening book is not a good idea because
>you have less memory and cannot use big programs if you use an opening book.

If the GM's are afraid to play the computers then I will be satisfied to watch
the GM's play the GM's and the computers play the computers.  The only regret I
will have over that situation is that I won't know when the computers definitely
pass the GM's.

To me, the most interesting matches are between very good computers and very
good humans.  But if the humans don't want to play, we can't make them can we?




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.