Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: _Wandering_ square of the _pawns_ rule

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 04:01:33 06/14/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 14, 2000 at 00:32:53, Ricardo Gibert wrote:

>On June 14, 2000 at 00:29:30, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>
>>The following should obviate the situation:
>>[D]8/8/8/PPPPP2P/5PP1/6p1/7p/2k4K b - - 0 1
>>1...Kd2 2 Kg2 Ke3 3 any h1=Q+ 4 Kxh1 Kf7 5 any g2+ 6 Kh2 g1=Q 7 Kh3 Qg3 mate.
>>If 4 Kxg3 Qg1+ 5 Kh4 Kxf4 and mate next move.
>
>That should be 4...Kf2 rather than 4...Kf7. Sorry.


OK, I get it now. Thanks.


    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.