Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: _Wandering_ square of the _pawns_ rule

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 00:26:14 06/15/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 14, 2000 at 00:07:46, Ricardo Gibert wrote:

>On June 13, 2000 at 23:33:05, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>>[D]8/8/8/8/P1k1P3/6p1/7p/7K w - - 0 1
>>>
>>>Here is another example that I invented when the rule fails.
>>>
>>>The rule is correct here that white pawns are unstoppable but cannot see that
>>>black pawns+king  also cannot be stopped.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>
>>What happens here? Isn't white winning?
>>
>>I shoud seriously try to learn how to play chess. :)
>>
>>
>>    Christophe
>
>Kc4-d3-e3-f2 folowed by g2 wins. If white tries to stop this with Kg2, then h1=Q
>Kxh1 Kf2 anyways. The white pawns are essentially irrelevant, since they are too
>slow.

If the e4 pawn is on f4, white wins.  If white advances the e4 pawn, the pawn
queens in a bad spot and can't do anything in time to prevent black from mating.
 If white advances the a-pawn, the e-pawn blocks the new queen.  With the e-pawn
on f4, the a-pawn is fast enough.

bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.