Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:25:13 06/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2000 at 11:01:11, Albert Silver wrote: >On June 15, 2000 at 08:09:00, Hans Gerber wrote: > >>On June 14, 2000 at 23:37:14, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On June 14, 2000 at 09:14:25, Hans Gerber wrote: >>> >>>>Topic: Certain details of the match between DB and Kasparov >>>> >>>>On June 13, 2000 at 22:57:09, Albert Silver wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 13, 2000 at 18:08:16, Hans Gerber wrote: >>>>> >>>>The isolated solution of positions is not the same as a game of chess. Kasparov >>>>thought that certain decisions by the machine simply contradicted the typically >>>>machine-like style of playing chess. >>> >>>He thought so based on specific moves, moves that he presented. Why anyone would >>>expect a multi-million dollar computer chess project to play the same as Fritz >>>thinking all night is beyond me. Also, I'd like to know how Kasparov qualified >>>as an expert on what Deep Blue was capable of seeing in chess. If anyone knew, >>>it was Deep blue's creators. >> >> >>Yes, and the meaning of that? That they should have sat together... >> > > >Meaning his accusation isn't based on an expert opinion but based on his >over-active imagination and lack of information. He isn't saying, "Based on my >expert knowledge of what computers (supercomputers) are capable of doing, and >the limitations of what programming and technology can bring, these moves could >not have been made by a machine." Instead he is saying, "Nice moves, cheating >must be involved." Based on nothing. You do know who you are arguing with, right? hint: it is hopeless.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.