Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 21:53:02 06/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2000 at 00:46:44, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >Unfortunately, backward compatibility sometimes is more important than >performance/reliability/(you name it). This is cowtowing to broken code (that assumes integers/longs whatever have a certain number of bits in them). Too many decisions like that for me, but I guess I should have gone to committee meetings and pitched a cross-eyed hissy-fit if I wanted it otherwise strongly enough.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.