Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 21:12:27 06/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2000 at 00:46:44, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >Unfortunately, backward compatibility sometimes is more important than >performance/reliability/(you name it). > >Eugene Backwards compatibility for _broken_code_ could have been achieved with a switch to force "int" to be 32 bits -- a switch that is _off_ by default. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.