Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To : Jorge Pichard (about creating the best CM6000 personality)

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 07:19:45 06/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 17, 2000 at 03:41:47, Martin Grabriel wrote:

>Hi Jorge,
>
>Have you tried the Bendorz against CM-Queen+ ?
>Some games I tried between the 2 suggested that the Bendorz is better
>but the number of games is too few to be significant.
>Would you like to try it on your hardware?
>(not on CM7000, but on CM6000 platform, please.)
>
> It depends what time Control you are using, since I noticed that CM=SS10 in
40/2 games plays better than my settings, but at time control between 10 to 60
Minutes per game, the CMQueen+ settings plays better so far. I also noticed that
in time control between 60 to 120 Minutes against CM=SS10 my settings is very
close to CM=SS10, since some games in which CMQueen+ lost with either white side
of the board or black, when I switch the side the the opposite happens CMQueen+
win. Therefore, the Opening has a lot to do with the outcome when the two
settings are too close in performance. I Just played two games Yesterday using
time control of 120 between CMQueen+ and CM=SS10, the first game my setting won,
but the second game after I switched side using the same opening until move 15,
my setting lost. Here is the game for you to analyze, using an AMD K6-2 500 Mhz
with 128 RAM. I can only claim that CMQueen+ settings is stronger than CM=SS10
at time control between 10 to 60 Minutes.



[Date " 2000 06 16 " ]
[White " CM=SS10 " ]
[Black " CMQueen+ " ]
[Result " 0-1 " ]
[Time Control 120 Min per Game " ]


1.e4 e5  2.Nf3 d6  3.d4 Nd7  4.Bc4 c6  5.0-0 Be7  6.dxe5 dxe5  7.Ng5 Bxg5
8.Qh5 Qe7  9.Bxg5 Nf6  10.Qe2 h6  11.Bh4 0-0  12.a4 Nc5  13.Nd2 Rd8  14.Rfd1 Be6
15.Bxe6 Nxe6  16.a5 Nd4  17.Qc4 Rd6  18.c3 Rad8  19.cxd4 Rxd4  20.Bxf6 Qxf6
21.Qc3 Qd6  22.Kf1 Rxd2  23.Rxd2 Qxd2  24.Qxd2 Rxd2  25.Rh2 c5  26.Ke1 Rc2
27.Kf1 f6  28.h4 h5  29.g3 g5  30.hxg5 fxg5  31.Ra1 Rxb2  32.a6 b5  33.Rd1 Ra2
34.Rd8+ Kf7  35.Rd7+ Ke6  36. Rxa7 b4 CM=10 is lost at this point 37.Ke1 Kd6
38.Ra8 b3  39.a7 c4 ( Move 40.Rd8+ does not win since 40...Kc7 41.a8=Q Rxa8
42.Rxa8 and b2 is a killer move for black since 43. Ra7+ Kb6 and CM=SS10 will be
loosing Queen Vs Rook ) 40.Kd1 Kc7  41.Rb8 Rxa7  42.Rb4 Kd6  43.f3 Kc5
44.Rb8 Kd4  45.Kc1 Kc3  46.Kd1 Ra3  47.g4 b2  48.Ke1 Rb3  49.Rxb3 cxb3
50.Kf2 b1=Q  51.gxh5 Qa2+  52.Kg3 b2  53.Kg4 b1=Q 54.Kxg5 Qc1+ 55.Kf6 Qh6+
56.Ke7 Qa7+ 57.Kd8 Qf8++  0-1

PS: It is interesting to notice that when you reside side, it take CM=SS10
78 moves to checkmate my CMQueen+ Settings. Mr Gabriel can you tell me what time
control you used to match my settings vs BENDORZ settings, also how many games
did you played.?

>
>
>BENDORZ settings:
>
>Book : CM6000
>
>Attacker/Defender +3;
>Strength of play 100;
>Randomness of play 0;
>Maximal search depth 20;
>Selective search 10.
>
>Material/Position -3;
>Control of center 103;
>Mobility 103;
>King safety 133,
>Passed pawns 100;
>Pawn weakness 133
>
>Own Queen 9.2 (!)
>Opp. Queen 9.0
>Rest original CM6000's
>
>
>
>sorry I can't remember the name of
>Bendorz's creator. It is his/her credit.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.