Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 07:24:39 06/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2000 at 10:19:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On June 17, 2000 at 03:41:47, Martin Grabriel wrote: > >>Hi Jorge, >> >>Have you tried the Bendorz against CM-Queen+ ? >>Some games I tried between the 2 suggested that the Bendorz is better >>but the number of games is too few to be significant. >>Would you like to try it on your hardware? >>(not on CM7000, but on CM6000 platform, please.) >> >> It depends what time Control you are using, since I noticed that CM=SS10 in >40/2 games plays better than my settings, but at time control between 10 to 60 >Minutes per game, the CMQueen+ settings plays better so far. I also noticed that >in time control between 60 to 120 Minutes against CM=SS10 my settings is very >close to CM=SS10, since some games in which CMQueen+ lost with either white side >of the board or black, when I switch the side the opposite happens CMQueen+ >win. Therefore, the Opening has a lot to do with the outcome when the two >settings are too close in performance. I Just played two games Yesterday using >time control of 120 between CMQueen+ and CM=SS10, the first game my setting won, >but the second game after I switched side using the same opening until move 15, >my setting lost. Here is the game for you to analyze, using an AMD K6-2 500 Mhz >with 128 RAM. I can only claim that CMQueen+ settings is stronger than CM=SS10 >at time control between 10 to 60 Minutes. > > > >[Date " 2000 06 16 " ] >[White " CM=SS10 " ] >[Black " CMQueen+ " ] >[Result " 0-1 " ] >[Time Control 120 Min per Game " ] > > >1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 Nd7 4.Bc4 c6 5.0-0 Be7 6.dxe5 dxe5 7.Ng5 Bxg5 >8.Qh5 Qe7 9.Bxg5 Nf6 10.Qe2 h6 11.Bh4 0-0 12.a4 Nc5 13.Nd2 Rd8 14.Rfd1 Be6 >15.Bxe6 Nxe6 16.a5 Nd4 17.Qc4 Rd6 18.c3 Rad8 19.cxd4 Rxd4 20.Bxf6 Qxf6 >21.Qc3 Qd6 22.Kf1 Rxd2 23.Rxd2 Qxd2 24.Qxd2 Rxd2 25.Rh2 c5 26.Ke1 Rc2 >27.Kf1 f6 28.h4 h5 29.g3 g5 30.hxg5 fxg5 31.Ra1 Rxb2 32.a6 b5 33.Rd1 Ra2 >34.Rd8+ Kf7 35.Rd7+ Ke6 36. Rxa7 b4 CM=10 is lost at this point 37.Ke1 Kd6 >38.Ra8 b3 39.a7 c4 ( Move 40.Rd8+ does not win since 40...Kc7 41.a8=Q Rxa8 >42.Rxa8 and b2 is a killer move for black since 43. Ra7+ Kb6 and CM=SS10 will be >loosing Queen Vs Rook ) 40.Kd1 Kc7 41.Rb8 Rxa7 42.Rb4 Kd6 43.f3 Kc5 >44.Rb8 Kd4 45.Kc1 Kc3 46.Kd1 Ra3 47.g4 b2 48.Ke1 Rb3 49.Rxb3 cxb3 >50.Kf2 b1=Q 51.gxh5 Qa2+ 52.Kg3 b2 53.Kg4 b1=Q 54.Kxg5 Qc1+ 55.Kf6 Qh6+ >56.Ke7 Qa7+ 57.Kd8 Qf8++ 0-1 > >PS: It is interesting to notice that when you switch side, it take CM=SS10 >78 moves to checkmate my CMQueen+ Settings. Mr Gabriel can you tell me what time >control you used to match my settings vs BENDORZ settings, also how many games >did you played.? > >> >> >>BENDORZ settings: >> >>Book : CM6000 >> >>Attacker/Defender +3; >>Strength of play 100; >>Randomness of play 0; >>Maximal search depth 20; >>Selective search 10. >> >>Material/Position -3; >>Control of center 103; >>Mobility 103; >>King safety 133, >>Passed pawns 100; >>Pawn weakness 133 >> >>Own Queen 9.2 (!) >>Opp. Queen 9.0 >>Rest original CM6000's >> >> >> >>sorry I can't remember the name of >>Bendorz's creator. It is his/her credit.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.