Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 09:59:29 06/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2000 at 12:07:05, Chessfun wrote: >On June 17, 2000 at 10:19:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >> It depends what time Control you are using, since I noticed that CM=SS10 in >>40/2 games plays better than my settings, but at time control between 10 to 60 >>Minutes per game, the CMQueen+ settings plays better so far. I also noticed that >>in time control between 60 to 120 Minutes against CM=SS10 my settings is very >>close to CM=SS10, since some games in which CMQueen+ lost with either white side >>of the board or black, when I switch the side the the opposite happens CMQueen+ >>win. Therefore, the Opening has a lot to do with the outcome when the two >>settings are too close in performance. I Just played two games Yesterday using >>time control of 120 between CMQueen+ and CM=SS10, the first game my setting won, >>but the second game after I switched side using the same opening until move 15, >>my setting lost. Here is the game for you to analyze, using an AMD K6-2 500 Mhz >>with 128 RAM. I can only claim that CMQueen+ settings is stronger than CM=SS10 >>at time control between 10 to 60 Minutes. > >I am not sure that is true. >Since CM SS10 clearly won the tournament I ran at 60/game, I will now >run the same engines at 30/game and post that when complete. > >Thanks. Winning a tournament where there is more than 4 competitors will definitively give you a different result than matching two personalities as I did last week using diferents time control at 15, 30, 45 and 60 Minutes. The way that I matched them was by playing two games with the same opening and rotating sides, then another opening was selected allowing both setting to play both sides again and so on... Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.