Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 14:20:06 11/01/97

Go up one level in this thread

On November 01, 1997 at 15:04:45, Mark Young wrote:

>Looking at the scores right now, it seem to be better to have the
>stonger chess program. Then the fastest hardware.

Not sure what you mean, but Ferret has *both*.  Anything can happen
in a tournament with this many good players, but come visit ICC and
watch Ferret play the commercial programs.  It wins far more than it
loses.  This includes many games from last year against Junior even.


So don't conclude that it can't play and only relies on speed.  You'd
be *way* wrong.

• Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10 Hristo 00:10:17 11/02/97
  • Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10 Rolf Tueschen 14:56:47 11/02/97
    • Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10 Robert Hyatt 15:50:46 11/02/97
  • Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10 Robert Hyatt 06:54:50 11/02/97
    • Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10 Mark Young 08:08:46 11/02/97
      • Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10 Mark Young 08:47:30 11/02/97
    • Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10 Mark Young 07:34:18 11/02/97
      • Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10 Robert Hyatt 12:43:57 11/02/97
        • Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10 Mark Young 18:40:10 11/03/97

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.