Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WMCCC Results and Standings after Round 10

Author: Hristo

Date: 00:10:17 11/02/97

Go up one level in this thread


On November 01, 1997 at 17:20:06, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On November 01, 1997 at 15:04:45, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>Looking at the scores right now, it seem to be better to have the
>>stonger chess program. Then the fastest hardware.
>
>Not sure what you mean, but Ferret has *both*.  Anything can happen
>in a tournament with this many good players, but come visit ICC and
>watch Ferret play the commercial programs.  It wins far more than it
>loses.  This includes many games from last year against Junior even.
>
>
>So don't conclude that it can't play and only relies on speed.  You'd
>be *way* wrong.

Robert,
he is not "concluding" this. His statement seems perfectly accurate!
It's difficult to understand why are you passing judgment so quickly.
Hope you are not overreacting because "Crafty" is getting slapped around
...
it can happen even to the best! :)))
Why do you think this happened to Crafty?! Is it possible that the other
programs are very good also?!

Regards.
Hristo



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.