Author: blass uri
Date: 15:30:58 06/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2000 at 17:25:00, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On June 18, 2000 at 17:17:55, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On June 18, 2000 at 16:12:34, Nick Kratsias wrote: >> >>>On June 18, 2000 at 11:09:49, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>Fritz is proving on the Frankfurt Rapid chess classic that indeed it could be >>>>accomplish, to beat Kasparvov in a mini match of 5 games at 30 min per game. >>>>I am basing this on the fact that Anand is a better player at blitz than >>>>Kasparov and so far Fritz has not lost a single game yet. The Primergy is not as >>>>close as what Deep Blue was, but being able to calculate over 2.8 moves per >>>>second is a big plus when playing at 25 Min per game or even at 30 Minutes. >>>> >>>>Pichard. >>> >>>Kasparov is better at g/30, and in a match of 4 games at this time control, >>>anand beat fritz last year. >> >>The improvement on fritz is about 30 points from last year, plus Primergy is >>about 3 times faster this year 900,000 positions per seconds vs 2.8 millions >>positions per seconds. Point in case Anand has not won a single game agains >>fritz on this Rapid Chess Classic at Frankfurt. >It is much harder for a programmer like frans to built a special opening agains >different opponents as it was in this case. The problem of Fritz was not opening book but the fact that it has problems with king attacks. In these 25 minutes/game the best chance against computers is to play for a king attack. Fritz lost 2 games because of king attacks. Chess system tal often win against top programs by king attack at long time control so it has good results in the millenium tournament. You can see some games of the millenium tournament in http://www.oxford-softworks.com/fcchess.html Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.