Author: leonid
Date: 04:48:31 06/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2000 at 19:52:46, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On June 19, 2000 at 19:38:10, leonid wrote: > >>Anyway, if simple 12 plies deep search is still not enough, much deeper search >>should give correct answer. Analysis in this situation is just like learning >>about our Moon through telescope. In practical and actual moment it almost >>unique way to know something about this satellite. But the best way is to go >>there personally. Material echange logic in chess is just like going to the >>Moon. Expensive but best way possible. > >I don't understand what you mean by material exchange logic. > >Your logic to find material wins should be the same as your logic to find >positional wins, except for the evaluation function. > >-Tom Material echange I use in order of not saying, what is so natural for me to say, "positional logic". For me this part of the logic (contrary to the "mate solving logic". Mate solving logic search for mate only and don't use any material avaluation) calculate how much material could be gain after given move at given depth. For instance, given move, after its deposition in upper ply, give 8000 and later, 8 plies deep give -2000. Final result is 6000. This evaluation say me practically everything about position. Problem is only that number of plies that you can search, after the time that you have, is limited. Leonid.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.