Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 09:35:15 06/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2000 at 00:23:37, Daniel Chancey wrote: >Try testing CMQueen+ against an attacking computer. and If you've seen the >games I posted, I can explain why CMQueen+ needs a tiny tweek. > >Castle2000 I agreed that possibly CMQueen+ needs a tiny tweek, but the only program stronger than Tiger 12.Oe tactically would be Fritz 6a which I owned, and even my latest CMQueen+ settings is not strong enough yet to beat it. If you test CMQueen+ in a mini match of 30 games against Lg2000 v 2.8 you will find out that CMQueen+ will beat it easy, I have done several tests against it as well. PS: I also have found out that when you make it stronger in one area for instance in King Safety, at the same time it will become weaker in other area, for instance it will not be as agressive with it king at the endgames where it is needed the most. My latest CMQueen+ settings is a well rounded solid settings. Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.