Author: blass uri
Date: 02:53:25 06/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2000 at 04:01:55, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On June 22, 2000 at 00:31:59, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On June 21, 2000 at 17:22:34, Bertil Eklund wrote: >> >>>On June 21, 2000 at 13:58:12, Albert Silver wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>> I ran across the following posted a few days ago. >>>>http://www.computerchess.com/news_e.html#17 >>>> >>>> Albert Silver >>>We haven't published any letters of the correspondence, but instead Millenium >>>qoute a part of a private letter. >>> >>>I guess from now on that mr Weiner accepts that we publish his letters to us. >>>If he wants them published, we can fix it as the whole correspondence is saved. >> >>Nah! >> >>Don't publish. Spare yourself the trouble. Head up and continue your >>valuable work. >> >>Ed >> >> >>>Bertil SSDF > >Thanks for the support and advise! > >Bertil I think that you should continue your work and the public games that we can download are important I do not understand one thing: You do not give all the games because part of the testers are too lazy to give the games. How can we be sure that they are not also too lazy to play the games. I do not understand the problem to give games. Sending a pgn file of the games is an easy job. I think that playing games is most of the work. My opinion is that you should use only the public games in order to calculate the ssdf list. If somebody send results without games simply ignore him(her) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.