Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 05:41:30 11/04/97
Go up one level in this thread
Thanks for the details. But I think / thought CCC was a serious expert forum. :) You did NOT explain the real question. More. Your explanation for instance that Czub wasn't able to reproduce Re8, shows for me a lacking scientifical reasoning. Because the funny point is (I made it clear in rgcc already) that the pretended "easy draw" with Qe1 isn't wasy at all. Sure, FRITZ and as you said others prgs too, showed 0.00. But that is exactly the problem. Because there is NO easy repetition of moves after wKd4..... For all the ballyhoo about finally a serious experts elite forum ccc I had wished a deaper analysis after two days of thinking. Again therefore, what was going on there? Or is it secret war knowledge like DB/IBM? Or is it a trivial nullmove problem? I wished I was an expert too. :) Wake up please. We're talking about one of the most interesting games of the Wch in Paris. No ideas?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.