Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 14:47:42 06/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2000 at 05:53:25, blass uri wrote: >On June 22, 2000 at 04:01:55, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On June 22, 2000 at 00:31:59, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On June 21, 2000 at 17:22:34, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>> >>>>On June 21, 2000 at 13:58:12, Albert Silver wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I ran across the following posted a few days ago. >>>>>http://www.computerchess.com/news_e.html#17 >>>>> >>>>> Albert Silver >>>>We haven't published any letters of the correspondence, but instead Millenium >>>>qoute a part of a private letter. >>>> >>>>I guess from now on that mr Weiner accepts that we publish his letters to us. >>>>If he wants them published, we can fix it as the whole correspondence is saved. >>> >>>Nah! >>> >>>Don't publish. Spare yourself the trouble. Head up and continue your >>>valuable work. >>> >>>Ed >>> >>> >>>>Bertil SSDF >> >>Thanks for the support and advise! >> >>Bertil > >I think that you should continue your work >and the public games that we can download are important > >I do not understand one thing: >You do not give all the games because part of the testers are too lazy to give >the games. >How can we be sure that they are not also too lazy to play the games. This is a very good point which i support getting answerred. >I do not understand the problem to give games. I don't understand the problem at all. No games , then scores not counted. >Sending a pgn file of the games is an easy job. >I think that playing games is most of the work. >My opinion is that you should use only the public games in order to calculate >the ssdf list. Excellent comment, though we must take into account that this hasn't anything to do with SSDF versus Millennium so let's give this thread a new name. >If somebody send results without games simply ignore him(her) > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.