Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WAC.230 -- is it Whacked.230 ?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 11:33:49 06/23/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 23, 2000 at 13:12:20, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On June 23, 2000 at 13:01:55, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>Here is WAC.230, for which the "right answer" is Rb4:
>>[D] 2b5/1r6/2kBp1p1/p2pP1P1/2pP4/1pP3K1/1R3P2/8 b - - acd 20; acn 175168255; acs
>>1000; bm Rb4; ce 247; id "WAC.230"; pv Rh7 Rb1 a4 Ba3 Rh5 Kg4 Kd7 Bb2 Bb7 Ba3
>>Ba6 Bb4 Rh7 Ba3;
>>
>>But here we are after a4:
>>[D] 2b5/1r6/2kBp1p1/3pP1P1/p1pP4/1pP3K1/1R3P2/8 w - - acd 21; acn 180101195; acs
>>1001; ce -321; id "WAC.230 after a4"; pv Ba3 Rh7 Rb1 Rh5 Kg4 Bb7 Ra1 Kd7 Rb1 Kc7
>>Kf4 Kc6;
>>
>>And here we are after Rb4:
>>[D] 2b5/8/2kBp1p1/p2pP1P1/1rpP4/1pP3K1/1R3P2/8 w - - acd 18; acn 183859758; acs
>>1000; ce -233; id "WAC.230 after Rb4"; pv cxb4 a4 b5+ Kxb5 Rb1 c3 Ba3 Kc4 Kf4
>>Kxd4 f3 Kd3 Rd1+ Kc2 Rc1+ Kd2 Rh1 c2 Bb2 d4 Bxd4;
>>
>>And here we are after Rh7:
>>[D] 2b5/7r/2kBp1p1/p2pP1P1/2pP4/1pP3K1/1R3P2/8 w - - acd 20; acn 174240961; acs
>>1000; ce -321; id "WAC.230 after Rh7"; pv Rb1 a4 Kg4 Bb7 Bc5 Ba6 Ba3 Rh2 Kg3 Rh5
>>Kg4 Kd7 Bc5 Bb5 Rb2 Rh1 Ba3 Rh2 f3;
>>
>>It seems from a fairly deep evaluation that the 'aftermath' of both a4 and Rh7
>>is worse for white than after Rb4.  So the burning question is, is everybody
>>really positive that they have been getting the wrong answer all these years, or
>>are we just wearing the emporor's new clothes?
>>;-)
>>
>>Equivalently, are we really sure that a4 and Rb7 are not just as good or even
>>superior?  If not, why not?
>
>Are you analyzing these positions with your own mind or are you just letting a
>computer look at them with a shallow search?
>
>The problem contends that black can't break through by normal means.  Whit is
>going to play Ba3 to blockade the a-pawn, and can prevent penetration on the
>k-side.
>
>In the solution, black plays ... Rb4, threatening ... Ra4 and ... Ra2.  If white
>takes the rook, the pawns advance and win.
>
>Is anything you are saying challenging either aspect of this?
>
>bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.