Author: Hans Gerber
Date: 15:33:02 06/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2000 at 18:12:51, pete wrote: >On June 23, 2000 at 17:51:38, Hans Gerber wrote: > >>To the moderation board: >> >>I want to ask here in public and also in email to the moderation board if I am >>allowed to write articles in this club without being attacked from Hyatt and >>PeteR. as if I would be someone else? >> >>Further I want to know what this is about this "Rolf". Is he excluded from this >>group? >> >>Honestly I can not develop my thoughts in freedom if I am harrassed not for my >>ideas but for ridiculous theories some special people have about me. >> >>I want to ask the board of moderators that they think about a working method to >>invite R. Hyatt and Pete R. to concentrate their efforts on computerchess. >> >> >> >>Hans Gerber > >a.) Be patient with the computerchess guys . If you are not who they claim you >are why not simply : " I am not Rolf Tueschen . I am simply Hans Gerber . Now >leave me alone and let me read and talk about computerchess or sit in my >wheelchair reading a nice Herman Hesse novel . " > >This is the more scientific approach as you should do everything to avoid them >being irritated by your posts to get the most objective input by them ( or did I >misunderstand you here ? ) . Not always the best articles get the most reactions. That is the other side of the internet. > >b.) Pete R.'s post was extremely interesting IMHO and could have been a very >fair end to this endless Kasparov discussion as it was the 1st one containing >new aspects I have seen for at least one year and this without the musings >about your identity which is of limited interest anyway ; even if you are this >misterious Rolf Tueschen ( which I don't know and don't mind ) , who cares ??? >. Yes, thanks for your opinion. But for questions of self-respect I am not ready to accept the fact that 1. certain members have extra rights to attack other members and 2. in the mean-time R. Hyatt seems to believe that he could censor a whole topic. You are quite right. Pete R. wrote a wonderful article but then he couldn't resist to go below his own level of mutual respect. However the debate is not ready to be closed simply because certain details are still unknown. I am so much dissapointed because I thought that this was a group of high standards with its moderation. If I really rambled and disturbed people R. Hyatt would be right but I try to represent some thoughts one could have about the event because scientists took part. In that role it is absolutely nonsense to accuse me of being some strange other person. This is a clear attempt of censorship which is in opposition with science. Thank you again Hans Gerber P.S. Yes I am Hans Gerber. Is it really possible that you have to give such declarations here in this club? Unbelievable. Who is KarinsDad? Who Pete R.?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.