Author: Chessfun
Date: 21:01:57 06/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2000 at 20:09:03, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On June 23, 2000 at 11:06:26, Chessfun wrote: > >> >>Told yer. >> >>Thanks > >In your first mini match of 30 games at G/30 they actually ended tied at the end >of the 30 games. Now if you take fritz 6a vs Fritz 6a and play 30 games at >whatever time control against itself the side the will win it will always be the >side of the opening that has the advantage. therefore, the only reasonable way >to test two personalities settings would be to let one settings play 15 games >with white pieces and then switch personalities and color and repeat the same 15 >openings for the remaining of the 15 games. This method allows both settings to >play the same opening 15 times with both side of the board. > >Pichard. Again without sufficient quantity of openings it proves nothing more than just letting them play from book. Some of the settings may be more positional while others more tactical, some defensive some offensive. While the 15 openings you happen to play could suit one of those settings. The same argument is naturally also applied to Nunn but to me if enough games are played from book then you need not get into worrying about positional strengths or tactical strengths. IMHO 15 positions is not enough within the same program to say setting A is better than B. This is apparent with your CMQueen++ settings, while it wins some matches it also losses some the same as the other settings do. Even were a set of CM settings to prove better than the default and IMO there are a number that are better, whether they are better against other programs than the default I am not convinced of. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.