Author: Mark Young
Date: 21:21:35 06/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2000 at 19:18:51, enrico carrisco wrote: >The results would be interesting on two separate machines and 100+ games. I've >tried the tests for game in 3 min. on the same computer, and then on separate >computers (identical cpus.) Hiarcs gained an advantage when playing against >Fritz6a on the same cpu - but still lost overall. On separate computers, the >margin was much greater. > >I do believe, however, that the newer version of Hiarcs will have more ability >against these tactical monsters, despite its extremely positional playing style. > >-elc. I just ended a 100 game match, Fritz 6a beat Hiarcs 7.32 by 3 games, this makes them now almost equal in terms of rating at 5 mins on a PIII 800. It will be interesting to see if Hiarcs can hold its own or surpass Fritz 6a at longer time controls.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.