Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 19:26:55 06/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2000 at 23:04:56, stuart taylor wrote: > With a minimum of positional knowledge? Of course, brute force at 300 ply would >require absolutely no positional knowledge at all, to be an ultimate authority >on perfect positional chess moves. No human would ever beat it, and it wouldn't >require any opening knowledge either. > But maybe 200 ply also? or how about even 60 perhaps with just basic assesment >knowledge? > > At any rate, I would be much more intersted in a program that guranteed perfect >chess even if it required a few hours per move, than a super strong program like >fritz 6a which displays most of its strength after minutes, if not seconds. > I don't even mind if it made big blunders at 5-minute games,or even longer >games. >S. Taylor gillogly estimated about 28 ply.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.