Author: blass uri
Date: 23:42:22 06/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2000 at 02:39:43, blass uri wrote: >On June 26, 2000 at 02:02:17, Terry Ripple wrote: > >>Thankyou for any information in advance on this topic. >> >>Best regards, >>Terry > >I do not know what is the definition of "positional" chess. > >Every program has positions that it understands better and position that it does >not understand. > >If you mean finding the best move when there is no one move that wins material >then I believe that humans also do not understand often what is the best >move so we cannot know which programs is best. > >It is possible to do a test suite based on positions that humans understand but >it is only part of the practical positions that program have to play when they >do not see a way to win material. > >Uri I can add that another problem is that there are positions that humans believe that they understand but they do not understand. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.