Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:52:04 06/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2000 at 21:17:10, Chessfun wrote: >On June 26, 2000 at 20:25:11, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On June 26, 2000 at 18:19:37, Daniel Chancey wrote: >> >>>This defeat convinces me that Fritz 6a is much stronger than Chessmaster 6000. >>>If Chessmaster 8000 comes out, it better be 150 points stronger. >>> >>>Castle2000 >> >>If you compare the value of the rook in CMNimzo 732 to the value of the pawn >>you will immediately notice that there is too much of a difference, rook = 6.8 >>vs pawn =1.1 exactly 5.7 . I increased the value of the pawn to 1.5 and >>decreased the value of the rook to 6.5 and replay the game from move 27.Nd2 and >>CMNimzo 732 with the new values beat my fritz 6a. > > >But that is just one game from a given position. It don't mean settings >with those values would be stronger overall. > You are correct about this statement it is too early to assume anything yet, and based on only one type of ending where the rook is in disadvantage vs four pawns, the possibility of the same type of ending to occur twice is very limitted. But my settings reflected a more realistic value whenever a rook vs three pawns ending was reached, in my mini match between CMQueen++ vs CMNimzo 732. Pichard. > >>PS: Due to the current values of the pieces in my settings, CMQueen++ performs >>better against fritz 6a than the current settings of CMNimzo 732, unless Sarah >>makes the proper adjustment as I recommended. > > >Having made this statement and after I only posted one game, >I must assume you have played games at 60/game between CMNimzo >and Fritz 6 as well as the result you posted between CMQueen++ >and Fritz 6. So could you please post them. > >Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.