Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Truly deserved computer ratings?

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 21:32:15 06/26/00

  Is it not true that human ratings are lower than computer ratings relative to
true standard of play due to the fact that humans make many blunders of the
nature that computers do not?
  That is what I Have always beleived as being one of the reasons why computers
do as well as they do.
  In other words, it could possibly be that 2650 on ssdf = 2550 against
well-prepared, top humans or even 2500 which is = 2400 in actual standard of
play, discounting tactical and mechanical extras.
Is this correct?

• Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? David Blackman 22:56:53 06/27/00
  • Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? stuart taylor 01:04:49 06/29/00
    • Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? Dann Corbit 13:28:54 06/29/00
      • Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? stuart taylor 23:31:50 06/29/00
        • Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? blass uri 01:08:59 06/30/00
        • Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? Dann Corbit 00:22:01 06/30/00
• Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? blass uri 04:45:24 06/27/00
• Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? Dann Corbit 21:44:20 06/26/00
  • Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? stuart taylor 22:01:48 06/26/00
    • Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? Dann Corbit 00:24:35 06/27/00
      • Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? Peter Skinner 07:02:27 06/27/00
        • Re: Truly deserved computer ratings? Robert Hyatt 10:09:39 06/27/00

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.