Author: stuart taylor
Date: 21:45:05 06/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2000 at 02:42:22, blass uri wrote: >On June 26, 2000 at 02:39:43, blass uri wrote: > >>On June 26, 2000 at 02:02:17, Terry Ripple wrote: >> >>>Thankyou for any information in advance on this topic. >>> >>>Best regards, >>>Terry >> >>I do not know what is the definition of "positional" chess. >> >>Every program has positions that it understands better and position that it does >>not understand. >> >>If you mean finding the best move when there is no one move that wins material >>then I believe that humans also do not understand often what is the best >>move so we cannot know which programs is best. >> >>It is possible to do a test suite based on positions that humans understand but >>it is only part of the practical positions that program have to play when they >>do not see a way to win material. >> >>Uri > >I can add that another problem is that there are positions that humans believe >that they understand but they do not understand. > >Uri You are touching on something a bit deeper than what people sometimes think about, or know there is what to think about! Keep it up! S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.