Author: Hans Gerber
Date: 05:51:24 06/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2000 at 08:40:04, Mogens Larsen wrote: >Since there's no decisive proof for and against the claim of cheating, it's a >futile discussion and I fail to see the importance. The exhibition game is old >news by now. It was barely interesting then as far as I'm concerned and >completely insignificant now. Let it go. > >Best wishes... >Mogens Yes, thanks. Exactly! That is the reason why I wrote several posts. To clarify that it is by no mean p-r-o-v-e-n that Kasparov asked unreasonable and already answered questions. I agree with you that until these questions have not been answered the whole debate here in CCC is uninteresting. On the other hand I find it not fair if some people always repeat the same stuff to spoil Kasparov and his integrity. He asked the perhaps most important question for computerchess of these days. But he is treated as if the IBM logfiles had already answered all possible questions. Let us stop this. Hans
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.