Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF and Millenium

Author: Tony Hedlund

Date: 07:45:29 06/27/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 26, 2000 at 08:21:33, blass uri wrote:

>On June 26, 2000 at 06:55:35, Tony Hedlund wrote:
>
>>On June 24, 2000 at 05:16:31, blass uri wrote:
>>
>>>On June 24, 2000 at 04:05:41, Francesco Di Tolla wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 23, 2000 at 19:04:55, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>>>>>Of course he never complained in the "good old days"
>>>>>
>>>>>Bertil
>>>>
>>>>Well, I agree, but was there any suspect at that time? I guess that the
>>>>Autoplayer problems are much more recent stuff.
>>>>
>>>>regards
>>>>Franz
>>>
>>>The main problem is not the autoplayer but the fact that not all the games are
>>>public.
>>>
>>>The fact that people did not complain in the past does not tell us that there is
>>>not a problem.
>>>
>>>I do not support millenium and do not like the fact that they do not agree that
>>>the ssdf will test programs like Genius6.5 but I also do not like the fact that
>>>the ssdf do not ignore the not public games in their ssdf rating.
>>>
>>>I think that they can save time by not using the not public games for the ssdf
>>>rating and people will take their rating more seriously.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>It seem to me that people is taking our rating VERY seriously. It must be the
>>top most topic in generating posts.
>>
>>Tony
>
>I agree that using the word taking seriously was wrong but I think that people
>will believe your rating more if you do not use not public games for the rating.
>
>You are right that people can take your rating seriously without believing in
>it.
>
>Uri

It also seem to me that MOST people believe in our rating.

Tony



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.